Francis Fukuyama’s Our Posthuman Future fears that biotechnology will make monsters of us. Steven Rose weighs the evidence. The power to genetically enhance future generations could be a boon for humanity – or it could lead to an era of violent rebellion against the. Is a baby whose personality has been chosen from a gene supermarket still a human? If we choose what we create what happens to morality? Is this the end of .
|Country:||Antigua & Barbuda|
|Published (Last):||3 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||4.26 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.4 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A decade after his now-famous pronouncement of “the end of history,” Francis Fukuyama argues that as a posthunan of biomedical advances, we are facing the possibility of a future in which our humanity itself will be altered beyond recognition. In his opinion, control of biotechnology is a political necessity. Start reading Our Posthuman Future on your Kindle in under a minute.
But I don”t think that a careful reading of Huxley or Pozthuman leads to the conclusion that either writer believed religion to be the only grounds on which one could understand the meaning of being human. To use biotechnology to engage in what another Christian writer, C. As Peter Huber has argued, the personal computer, linked to the Internet, was in fact the realization of Orwell”s telescreen. Lewis, called the “abolition of man” is thus a violation of God”s will. Bokanovskification, the hatching fukuysma people not in wombs but, as we now say, in fjkuyama the drug soma, which gave people instant happiness; the Feelies, in which sensation was simulated by implanted electrodes; and the modification of behavior through constant subliminal repetition and, when that didn”t work, through the administration of various artificial hormones were what gave this book its particularly creepy ambiance.
OUR POSTHUMAN FUTURE: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution
By this I mean not just fighting metaphorically, in the sense of shouting matches among talking heads on TV and debates in Congress, oosthuman actually picking up guns and bombs and using them on other people. I don’t believe futude would answer in the affirmative. With at least a half century separating us from the publication of these books, we can see that while the technological predictions they made were startlingly accurate, the posfhuman predictions of the first book,were entirely wrong.
If one accepts the premise that human nature is fixed in an eternal quest for freedom, self-development and dignity and is manifested in superior intelligence, then one would want to remove any artificial roadblocks to creating the maximum environment in which these attributes could flourish. Don’t have a Kindle?
That any notion of human rights and ethics must be founded on a concept of human nature. Social transformations are an inevitable corollary of the dramatic changes in the nature of work and communication generated by technology. Fukuyama refers to the irreducible totality of these qualities as “Factor X”, “the complex whole” as opposed to “the sum of fhkuyama parts”, which forms the foundation of human dignity.
It could be one in which any notion of “shared humanity” is lost, because we have mixed human genes with those of so many other species that we no longer have a clear idea of what a human being is. Political freedom has heretofore meant the freedom to pursue those ends that our natures had established for us.
Partly it is a matter of force of habit, and what Max Weber once called the “ghost of dead religious beliefs” that continues to haunt us. So who is to tell us that being human and having dignity means sticking with a set of emotional responses that are the accidental by-product of our evolutionary history?
Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Moving from the botched philosophical underpinnings of the author’s position, perhaps he’ll redeem himself with an imaginative and informed description of how we as a future society and as a species might address the inevitable realities of genetic modification for enhancement very interestingor even just for treatment a bit tired?
Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go. Fukuyama will be speaking at the Guardian Hay festival on Saturday June 1. Of course, there has always been a degree of genetic selection: Whether certain forms of radical environmentalism will translate into hostility to human biotechnology remains to be seen.
Who said freedom to choose would mean wise choices? But if they become “children of choice” who have been genetically selected by their parents for certain characteristics, they may come to believe increasingly that their success is a matter not just of luck but of good choices and planning on the part of their parents, and hence something deserved. That year saw the introduction of a new model of the IBM personal computer and the beginning of what became the PC revolution.
Just five years afterin a series of dramatic events that would earlier have seemed like political science fiction, the Soviet Union and its empire collapsed, and the totalitarian threat that Orwell had so vividly evoked vanished.
See all 42 reviews. Hence, he argues, there is a human nature on which human rights can be based. Share your thoughts with other customers.
Works by Francis Fukuyama. Much of this hostility is driven by the stronger environmental movements in Europe, which have led the campaign, for example, against genetically modified foods. Though the subject of a should-be ffukuyama on the pedantics of contemporary rights talk, this would pothuman allowable if his arguments were compelling and clearly written, and if additionally these points were then leveraged to comprehensively describe what life and policy might look like in a future where the implications of biotech development at all touches on these points.
Again, prepare to be disappointed: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution is a book by Francis Fukuyama.
This text does neither. The Study of Human Nature: Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers. Rarely has someone entering the policy arena so eloquently and precisely laid out the case for political control of emerging technology.
Review: Our Posthuman Future by Francis Fukuyama | Books | The Guardian
There were many aspects of biotechnology that I had never taken the time to familiarize myself with but this book fukutama a lot of my questions. That moral order did not completely break down in the fukuyamma in the wake of the destruction of consensus on traditional religious values should not surprise us either, because moral order comes from within human nature itself and is not something that has to be imposed on human nature by culture. References to this book Transpositions: From the Industrial Revolution to the Present Day The much more common dystopic writing of the past 50 years has largely been posited on disruptive scientific and technological fantasies.
Until now, the left has on the whole been opposed to cloning, genetic engineering and similar biotechnologies for a number of reasons, including traditional humanism, environmental concerns, suspicion of technology and of the corporations that produce it, and fear of eugenics. This is the only scenario in which it is plausible that we will see a liberal democracy of the future get back into the business of state-sponsored eugenics.
There is no “nature” outside social context, and within the limits of evolved human biology the societies that we have created are extraordinarily diverse. All of this could change with the impact of future biotechnology. Showing of 42 reviews.